BHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Abacus Life has a net margin of 8.97% compared to Brighthouse Financial's net margin of -18.21%. Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of -25.86% beat Abacus Life's return on equity of -5.9%.

Brighthouse Financial has a consensus price target of $58.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.45%. On the other hand Abacus Life has an analysts' consensus of $13.88 which suggests that it could grow by 78.34%. Given that Abacus Life has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe Abacus Life is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 1.077, which suggesting that the stock is 7.738% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abacus Life has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Brighthouse Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Abacus Life offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brighthouse Financial pays -9.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Abacus Life pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Abacus Life quarterly revenues of $28.1M. Brighthouse Financial's net income of $176M is higher than Abacus Life's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, Brighthouse Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Abacus Life's PE ratio is 70.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brighthouse Financial is -- versus 5.17x for Abacus Life. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Citizens has a net margin of 8.97% compared to Brighthouse Financial's net margin of 4.52%. Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of -25.86% beat Citizens's return on equity of 11.99%.

Brighthouse Financial has a consensus price target of $58.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.45%. On the other hand Citizens has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 3.31%. Given that Citizens has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe Citizens is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 1.077, which suggesting that the stock is 7.738% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens has a beta of 0.115, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.462%.

Brighthouse Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Citizens offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brighthouse Financial pays -9.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Citizens quarterly revenues of $61.7M. Brighthouse Financial's net income of $176M is higher than Citizens's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Brighthouse Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Citizens's PE ratio is 11.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brighthouse Financial is -- versus 0.99x for Citizens. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Genworth Financial has a net margin of 8.97% compared to Brighthouse Financial's net margin of 4.61%. Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of -25.86% beat Genworth Financial's return on equity of 0.98%.

Brighthouse Financial has a consensus price target of $58.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.45%. On the other hand Genworth Financial has an analysts' consensus of $8.50 which suggests that it could grow by 16.12%. Given that Genworth Financial has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe Genworth Financial is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 1.077, which suggesting that the stock is 7.738% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genworth Financial has a beta of 1.001, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.11399999999999%.

Brighthouse Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Genworth Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brighthouse Financial pays -9.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Genworth Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Genworth Financial quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Brighthouse Financial's net income of $176M is higher than Genworth Financial's net income of $85M. Notably, Brighthouse Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Genworth Financial's PE ratio is 36.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brighthouse Financial is -- versus 0.45x for Genworth Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prudential Financial has a net margin of 8.97% compared to Brighthouse Financial's net margin of 2.29%. Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of -25.86% beat Prudential Financial's return on equity of 13.78%.

Brighthouse Financial has a consensus price target of $58.00, signalling downside risk potential of -6.45%. On the other hand Prudential Financial has an analysts' consensus of $126.14 which suggests that it could grow by 3.12%. Given that Prudential Financial has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe Prudential Financial is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 1.077, which suggesting that the stock is 7.738% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.311, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.077%.

Brighthouse Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Prudential Financial offers a yield of 4.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share. Brighthouse Financial pays -9.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Prudential Financial pays out 74.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Prudential Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than Prudential Financial quarterly revenues of $19.5B. Brighthouse Financial's net income of $176M is lower than Prudential Financial's net income of $448M. Notably, Brighthouse Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Prudential Financial's PE ratio is 10.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brighthouse Financial is -- versus 0.60x for Prudential Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.